Fuente: Forbes |
The idea
had initially been tabled at the start of the year as Saudi Arabia, Qatar,
Venezuela and Russia got
around the table. But Iran’s
determination to get the pumps ramped back up to pre-sanction levels put the
plan firmly on the backburner.
However,
with Tehran’s
reluctance to take part in a deal now apparently thawing, stock pickers have
become more optimistic over the growth outlook for many of the oil industry’s
major players.
BP has seen
its share price leap 4% in Thursday trading, for example, taking the firm to
four-month peaks around 450p per share. And a 6% rise at Royal Dutch Shell has
taken the driller to within a shade of the £20 marker. But are stock pickers
piling in too early?
Saudi
Saves?
Any
suggestions that OPEC — a body responsible for around 40% of total global
supply — could be about to curb production should be greeted with fanfare.
Recommended
by Forbes
Led by the
Saudis, the cartel this week informally agreed at Algiers to reduce output from 32.5m-33m
barrels of oil equivalent per day, down from around 33.24m barrels at present.
The next step will see policymakers designate cuts for each member state in the
run-up to November’s official meeting.
Still, some
friction may occur during the course of ‘divvying up’ each nation’s output. As
UBS points out, although Iran as apparently agreed to cut its target to 4m
barrels per day from 4.2 previously, problems may well appear elsewhere —
indeed, the broker notes that “it is unclear if any limits will be placed on
Iraq and Libya’s attempts to ramp up production.”
UBS
believes that global inventories would fall by 400,000 barrels per day during
the first half of 2017 should OPEC’s ceiling materialise, before accelerating
to 600,000 barrels in the second half and 1m barrels in 2018.
But UBS
remains uncertain over the oil price outlook looking ahead, its analysts citing
“uncertainty [that] quota allocations by country don’t lead to a breakdown in
the agreement (or cheating),” and “concerns that a quick rally into the $50s
will only serve to incentivise further increases in US drilling activity and
stimulate earlier than necessary production growth.”
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario