Fuente Web |
If the
PDVSA offer, which has been extended to October 21, expires without the use of
CITGO Holding Inc. (HOLDCO, Long-Term IDR 'B-') stock as collateral, Fitch
anticipates minimal effect on existing CITGO ratings. On the other hand, if the
PDVSA debt exchange does go through as proposed, the ratings linkage between
CITGO and parent PDVSA could be strengthened. Potential changes to CITGO's
ratings will be based on Fitch's assessment of changes in linkage between PDVSA
and CITGO based on the final terms of any exchange or agreement, particularly
with regard to a stronger legal connection between the two, as well as the
likelihood that triggering the change in control provision would heighten
CITGO's probability of default.
Under the
original terms of a debt exchange announced on Sept. 16, 2016, PDVSA expected
to issue new 8.5% sinking notes due 2022 under a voluntary exchange for two
existing bonds: a 8.5% sinking bond with $2.05 billion principal payments due
in November 2016 and November 2017 and a $3.0 billion 5.25% bond due in 2017.
The exchange offer has the potential to increase CITGO bondholders' exposure to
PDVSA default risk through the use of 50.1% of HOLDCO stock as collateral for
the new PDVSA notes. However, the situation remains fluid, terms are subject to
change and successful execution is questionable. On Oct. 6, ConocoPhillips
filed a complaint in Delaware
district court under the Delaware Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (DUFTA),
which could affect the debt exchange's appeal to lenders, as well as PDVSA's
ability to offer HOLDCO equity as collateral.
PDVSA has
extended the expiration deadline multiple times, most recently without changing
other key terms, after receiving "substantially less" than the 50%
minimum acceptance threshold for consummation. Absent an increase in
consideration or other change in terms, Fitch believes the exchange offer is
less likely to be successful.
Longer
term, Fitch believes that in the event of a PDVSA default, PDVSA bondholders
may not be successful in attempts to persuade Delaware
courts to ignore the corporate separateness of PDVSA and its Delaware entities and attach CITGO assets.
However, the potential for arbitral settlements and protracted litigation
against PDVSA and Venezuela
pose additional risks, primarily related to change-of-control considerations.
Given
CITGO's size, asset positioning, cash flow potential, and other factors, Fitch
informally estimates that, on a stand-alone basis with no parental rating
constraints, CITGO could be rated in the mid-to-high 'BB' range, and
potentially investment-grade, depending on the company's capitalization
following a change in control.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario