Fuente Web |
Stein
launched an online fundraising page seeking donations toward a $2.5m fund she
said was needed to request reviews of the results in Michigan, Pennsylvania and
Wisconsin.
Stein said
she was acting due to “compelling evidence of voting anomalies” and that data
analysis had indicated “significant discrepancies in vote totals” that were
released by state authorities.
“These
concerns need to be investigated before the 2016 presidential election is certified,”
she said in a statement. “We deserve elections we can trust.”
Stein’s
move came amid growing calls for recounts or audits of the election results by
groups of academics and activists concerned that foreign hackers may have
interfered with election systems. The concerned groups have been urging Hillary
Clinton, the defeated Democratic nominee, to join their cause.
Donald
Trump won unexpected and narrow victories against Clinton
in Pennsylvania and Wisconsin
earlier this month and may yet win Michigan,
where a final result has not yet been declared.
Stein and
her campaign made clear they were acting because they wanted to ensure the
election results were authentic, rather than because they thought she had
actually won any of the contests. Several states allow any candidate who was on
the ballot to request a recount.
She and
those seeking recounts will need to move swiftly. This Friday is the deadline
for requesting a recount in Wisconsin,
where Trump’s winning margin stands at 0.7%. In Pennsylvania, where his margin is 1.2%, the
deadline falls on Monday. In Michigan,
where the Trump lead is currently just 0.3%, the deadline is Wednesday 30
November.
The
Guardian previously disclosed that a loose coalition of academics and activists
concerned about the election’s security is preparing to deliver a report
detailing its concerns to congressional committee chairs and federal
authorities early next week, according to two people involved.
“I’m
interested in verifying the vote,” said Dr Barbara Simons, an adviser to the US election
assistance commission and expert on electronic voting. “We need to have
post-election ballot audits.” Simons is understood to have contributed analysis
to the effort but declined to characterise the precise nature of her
involvement.
A second
group of analysts, led by the National Voting Rights Institute founder John
Bonifaz and Professor Alex Halderman, the director of the University of Michigan’s
center for computer security and society, is also taking part in the push for a
review.
In a
blogpost earlier on Wednesday, Halderman said paper ballots and voting
equipment should be examined in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania.
“Unfortunately, nobody is ever going to examine that evidence unless candidates
in those states act now, in the next several days, to petition for recounts,”
he said.
Clinton’s defeat to Donald Trump followed
the release by US intelligence agencies of public assessments that Russian
hackers were behind intrusions into regional electoral computer systems and the
theft of emails from Democratic officials before the election.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario